Soft Tissue Infection Cant Be Biopsied Again
Skin and Soft Tissue Infections
Am Fam Medico. 2015 Sep fifteen;92(vi):474-483.
Patient information: Encounter related handout on skin and soft tissue infections, written by the authors of this article.
This clinical content conforms to AAFP criteria for continuing medical education (CME). See the CME Quiz Questions.
Author disclosure: No relevant financial affiliations.
Article Sections
- Abstruse
- Nomenclature
- Risk Factors
- Pathogenesis
- Clinical Presentation
- Diagnosis
- Management
- Special Considerations
- References
Skin and soft tissue infections result from microbial invasion of the skin and its supporting structures. Management is determined by the severity and location of the infection and by patient comorbidities. Infections can be classified as uncomplicated (unproblematic) or complicated (necrotizing or nonnecrotizing), or every bit suppurative or nonsuppurative. Almost community-acquired infections are acquired by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and beta-hemolytic streptococcus. Simple infections are normally monomicrobial and present with localized clinical findings. In dissimilarity, complicated infections can be mono- or polymicrobial and may present with systemic inflammatory response syndrome. The diagnosis is based on clinical evaluation. Laboratory testing may be required to confirm an uncertain diagnosis, evaluate for deep infections or sepsis, determine the need for inpatient care, and evaluate and care for comorbidities. Initial antimicrobial choice is empiric, and in uncomplicated infections should encompass Staphylococcus and Streptococcus species. Patients with complicated infections, including suspected necrotizing fasciitis and gangrene, require empiric polymicrobial antibiotic coverage, inpatient treatment, and surgical consultation for debridement. Superficial and small abscesses respond well to drainage and seldom require antibiotics. Immunocompromised patients crave early treatment and antimicrobial coverage for possible atypical organisms.
Skin and soft tissue infections (SSTIs) account for more than xiv million physician part visits each yr in the United states, likewise as emergency department visits and hospitalizations.ane The greatest incidence is amid persons 18 to 44 years of age, men, and blacks.1,2 Community-caused methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) accounts for 59% of SSTIs presenting to the emergency department.3
SORT: KEY RECOMMENDATIONS FOR Exercise
Clinical recommendation | Testify rating | References |
---|---|---|
Claret cultures seldom change treatment and are not required in healthy immunocompetent patients with SSTIs. | C | xx |
Simple purulent SSTIs in easily attainable areas without overlying cellulitis can be treated with incision and drainage only; antibiotic therapy does not improve outcomes. | C | 29, 30 |
Inpatient treatment is recommended for patients with uncontrolled SSTIs despite adequate oral antibiotic therapy; those who cannot tolerate oral antibiotics; those who require surgery; those with initial severe or complicated SSTIs; and those with underlying unstable comorbid illnesses or signs of systemic sepsis. | C | 3, 5 |
There is no testify that any pathogen-sensitive antibiotic is superior to another in the treatment of MRSA SSTIs. | B | 35 |
Handling of necrotizing fasciitis involves early recognition and surgical debridement of necrotic tissue, combined with high-dose broad-spectrum intravenous antibiotics. | C | v |
Best PRACTICES IN Infectious disease: RECOMMENDATIONS FROM THE CHOOSING WISELY CAMPAIGN
Recommendation | Sponsoring organization |
---|---|
Avoid antibiotics and wound cultures in emergency department patients with unproblematic pare and soft tissue abscesses after successful incision and drainage and with acceptable medical follow-up. | American College of Emergency Physicians |
Classification
- Abstruse
- Classification
- Risk Factors
- Pathogenesis
- Clinical Presentation
- Diagnosis
- Management
- Special Considerations
- References
SSTIs are classified as simple (uncomplicated) or complicated (necrotizing or nonnecrotizing) and tin can involve the peel, subcutaneous fat, fascial layers, and musculotendinous structures.four SSTIs can be purulent or nonpurulent (mild, moderate, or astringent).5 To help stratify clinical interventions, SSTIs tin exist classified based on their severity, presence of comorbidities, and demand for and nature of therapeutic intervention (Table 1).iii
Table i.
Classification Arrangement for Skin and Soft Tissue Infections
Class | Description |
---|---|
1 | Simple infection with no systemic signs or symptoms indicating spread* and no uncontrolled comorbidities that may complicate treatment; amenable to outpatient direction with topical or oral antimicrobials |
ii | Infection with systemic signs or symptoms indicating spread* or with stable comorbidities, or infection without systemic spread but with uncontrolled comorbidities; may require inpatient management or parenteral antibiotics |
3 | Infection with signs or symptoms of systemic spread* or uncontrolled comorbidities; inpatient management with parenteral antibiotics required |
4 | Infection with signs of potentially fatal systemic sepsis† requiring parenteral antibiotics; inpatient management (possibly in critical care unit) required, surgery may be indicated |
Simple infections bars to the skin and underlying superficial soft tissues generally respond well to outpatient management. Common simple SSTIs include cellulitis, erysipelas, impetigo, ecthyma, folliculitis, furuncles, carbuncles, abscesses, and trauma-related infections6 (Figures one through three). Complicated infections extending into and involving the underlying deep tissues include deep abscesses, decubitus ulcers, necrotizing fasciitis, Fournier gangrene, and infections from human being or creature bites7 (Effigy iv). These infections may present with features of systemic inflammatory response syndrome or sepsis, and, occasionally, ischemic necrosis. Perianal infections, diabetic foot infections, infections in patients with significant comorbidities, and infections from resistant pathogens also correspond complicated infections.8
Effigy ane.
Figure 2.
Figure 3.
Figure 4.
Gamble Factors
- Abstract
- Classification
- Run a risk Factors
- Pathogenesis
- Clinical Presentation
- Diagnosis
- Direction
- Special Considerations
- References
Older age, cardiopulmonary or hepatorenal affliction, diabetes mellitus, debility, immunosenescence or immunocompromise, obesity, peripheral arteriovenous or lymphatic insufficiency, and trauma are amid the risk factors for SSTIs (Tabular array 2).9–11 Outbreaks are more common among military personnel during overseas deployment and athletes participating in shut-contact sports.12,xiii Community-acquired MRSA causes infection in a broad diversity of hosts, from healthy children and young adults to persons with comorbidities, health care professionals, and persons living in shut quarters.
Table 2.
Take chances Factors for Skin and Soft Tissue Infections
Age (children,* older adults) |
Alcohol corruption† |
Asplenia |
Cardiopulmonary affliction |
Decrepitude |
Diabetes mellitus†‡ |
Dialysis (peritoneal, hemodialysis)‡ |
Wellness intendance professional* |
Hepatorenal disease |
Homo or animal bites |
Immunocompromise (due east.g., human immunodeficiency virus infection, chemotherapy, antiretroviral therapy, disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs) |
Immunosenescence |
Long-term care‡ |
Long-term intravascular access‡ |
Lymphedema or lymphatic insufficiency |
Military personnel* |
Obesity |
Peripheral arteriovenous insufficiency |
Peripheral neuropathy |
Poor diet† |
Prolonged hospitalization‡ |
Sports participation† |
Subcutaneous or intravenous drug use |
Trauma (including surgery)† |
Water exposure (e.g., ocean, hot tubs) |
Predisposing factors for SSTIs include reduced tissue vascularity and oxygenation, increased peripheral fluid stasis and adventure of skin trauma, and decreased ability to gainsay infections. For example, diabetes increases the run a risk of infection-associated complications fivefold.14 Comorbidities and mechanisms of injury tin can determine the bacteriology of SSTIs (Table 3).5,15 For instance, Pseudomonas aeruginosa infections are associated with intravenous drug use and hot tub use, and patients with neutropenia more than often develop infections caused by gram-negative leaner, anaerobes, and fungi.
Table iii.
Bacteriology and Clinical Features of Pare and Soft Tissue Infections
Infection | Microbiology | Clinical features |
---|---|---|
Abscess | Staphylococcus aureus, Streptococcus, anaerobes (often polymicrobial) | Drove of pus with surrounding granulation; painful swelling with induration and central fluctuance; possible overlying skin necrosis; signs or symptoms of infection*; features adulterate in common cold abscess; recurrent abscesses with sinus tracts and scarring in axillae and groin occur in hidradenitis suppurativa |
Bites (man, animate being) | Polymicrobial (Bacteroides, Bartonella henselae, Capnocytophaga canimorsus, Eikenella corrodens, Pasteurella multocida, Peptostreptococcus, S. aureus, Streptobacillus moniliformis) | Cat bites become infected more oftentimes than dog or man bites (30% to l%, up to 20%, and 10% to 50%, respectively); infection sets in 8 to 12 hours after animal bites; homo bites may transmit canker, hepatitis, or human immunodeficiency virus; may involve tendons, tendon sheaths, os, and joints |
Clostridial myonecrosis (gas gangrene) | Clostridium (unremarkably C. perfringens, C. septicum) | Traumatic or spontaneous; severe pain at injury site followed by skin changes (e.thou., pale, bronze, purplish ruby-red), tenderness, induration, blistering, and tissue crepitus; diaphoresis, fever, hypotension, and tachycardia |
Erysipelas, cellulitis | Beta-hemolytic streptococci, Haemophilus influenzae (children), S. aureus |
|
Folliculitis | Candida, dermatophytes, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Due south. aureus | Infection or inflammation of the pilus follicles; tends to occur in areas with increased sweating; associated with acne or steroid use; painful or painless pustule with underlying swelling |
Fournier gangrene | Polymicrobial | Genital, groin, or perineal involvement; cellulitis, and signs or symptoms of infection* followed by suppuration and necrosis of overlying skin |
Furuncle, carbuncle (deep folliculitis) | S. aureus | Walled-off collection of pus; painful, firm swelling; systemic features of infection; carbuncles are larger, deeper, and involve skin and subcutaneous tissue over thicker skin of cervix, dorsum, and lateral thighs, and drain through multiple pores |
Impetigo (non-bullous, bullous) | Beta-hemolytic streptococci, South. aureus | Common in infants and children; affects skin of olfactory organ, oral fissure, or limbs; mild soreness, redness, vesicles, and crusting; may cause glomerulonephritis; vesicles may overstate (bullae); may spread to lymph nodes, os, joints, or lung |
Necrotizing fasciitis | Type 1: polymicrobial | Spreading infection of subcutaneous tissue; usually affects genitalia, perineum, or lower extremities; severe, constant hurting; signs or symptoms of infection*; overlying redness and cutaneous anesthesia; edema and induration of apparently uninvolved tissues; skin crepitus; progression despite antibiotics |
Type two: monomicrobial |
Pathogenesis
- Abstruse
- Classification
- Run a risk Factors
- Pathogenesis
- Clinical Presentation
- Diagnosis
- Management
- Special Considerations
- References
Most SSTIs occur de novo, or follow a breach in the protective pare barrier from trauma, surgery, or increased tissue tension secondary to fluid stasis. The infection may besides originate from an adjacent site or from embolic spread from a distant site. Southward. aureus and streptococci are responsible for most elementary community-caused SSTIs. In i prospective report, beta-hemolytic streptococcus was found to cause about 3-fourths of cases of lengthened cellulitis.16 S. aureus, P. aeruginosa, enterococcus, and Escherichia coli are the predominant organisms isolated from hospitalized patients with SSTIs.17 MRSA infections are characterized by liquefaction of infected tissue and abscess formation; the resulting increase in tissue tension causes ischemia and overlying pare necrosis. Lymphatic and hematogenous dissemination causes septicemia and spread to other organs (e.g., lung, bone, center valves). Diabetic lower limb infections, astringent hospital-caused infections, necrotizing infections, and caput and hand infections pose higher risks of mortality and functional disability.9
Clinical Presentation
- Abstract
- Classification
- Risk Factors
- Pathogenesis
- Clinical Presentation
- Diagnosis
- Management
- Special Considerations
- References
Patients with simple SSTIs nowadays with erythema, warmth, edema, and pain over the affected site. Systemic features of infection may follow, their intensity reflecting the magnitude of infection. The lower extremities are nigh commonly involved.9 Induration is characteristic of more superficial infections such as erysipelas and cellulitis. Patients with necrotizing fasciitis may accept hurting disproportionate to the physical findings, rapid progression of infection, cutaneous anesthesia, hemorrhage or bullous changes, and crepitus indicating gas in the soft tissues.v Tense overlying edema and bullae, when present, aid distinguish necrotizing fasciitis from non-necrotizing infections.18
Diagnosis
- Abstract
- Classification
- Chance Factors
- Pathogenesis
- Clinical Presentation
- Diagnosis
- Direction
- Special Considerations
- References
The diagnosis of SSTIs is predominantly clinical. A complete blood count, C-reactive protein level, and liver and kidney function tests should be ordered for patients with severe infections, and for those with comorbidities causing organ dysfunction. The Laboratory Risk Indicator for Necrotizing Fasciitis score uses laboratory parameters to stratify patients into high- and low-adventure categories for necrotizing fasciitis (Tabular array 4); a score of 6 or higher is indicative, whereas a score of 8 or college is strongly predictive (positive predictive value = 93.iv%).xix
Table 4.
Laboratory Risk Indicator for Necrotizing Fasciitis
Laboratory value | Score |
---|---|
C-reactive protein | |
< 150 mg per L (< 1,430 nmol per L) | 0 |
≥ 150 mg per Fifty | four |
Creatinine | |
≤ 1.six mg per dL (≤ 141 μmol per L) | 0 |
> 1.vi mg per dL | two |
Glucose | |
≤ 180 mg per dL (≤ 10 mmol per L) | 0 |
> 180 mg per dL | 1 |
Hemoglobin | |
> 13.5 g per dL (> 135 m per L) | 0 |
11 to 13.5 g per dL (110 to 135 one thousand per L) | 1 |
< 11 chiliad per dL | 2 |
Sodium | |
≥ 135 mEq per 50 (≥ 135 mmol per L) | 0 |
< 135 mEq per L | 2 |
Total white blood cells | |
< 15,000 per mm3 (< 15.0 × 109 per 50) | 0 |
15,000 to 25,000 per mm3 (xv.0 × x9 to 25.0 × tenix per L) | 1 |
> 25,000 per mmiii | 2 |
Blood cultures are unlikely to change the management of simple localized SSTIs in otherwise salubrious, immunocompetent patients, and are typically unnecessary.xx Even so, because of the potential for deep tissue involvement, cultures are useful in patients with severe infections or signs of systemic interest, in older or immunocompromised patients, and in patients requiring surgery.5,21,22 Wound cultures are not indicated in most healthy patients, including those with suspected MRSA infection, only are useful in immunocompromised patients and those with significant cellulitis; lymphangitis; sepsis; recurrent, persistent, or large abscesses; or infections from human being or animate being bites.22,23 Tissue biopsies, which are the preferred diagnostic test for necrotizing SSTIs, are ideally taken from the advancing margin of the wound, from the depth of seize with teeth wounds, and after debridement of necrotizing infections and traumatic wounds. Sterile aspiration of infected tissue is some other recommended sampling method, preferably before commencing antibiotic therapy.22
Imaging studies are non indicated for simple SSTIs, and surgery should not exist delayed for imaging. Obviously radiography, ultrasonography, computed tomography, or magnetic resonance imaging may show soft tissue edema or fascial thickening, fluid collections, or soft tissue air. Magnetic resonance imaging is highly sensitive (100%) for necrotizing fasciitis; specificity is lower (86%).24 Extensive involvement of the deep intermuscular fascia, fascial thickening (more than 3 mm), and fractional or complete absence of indicate enhancement of the thickened fasciae on postgadolinium images suggest necrotizing fasciitis.25 Calculation ultrasonography to clinical exam in children and adolescents with clinically suspected SSTI increases the accurateness of diagnosing the extent and depth of infection (sensitivity = 77.6% vs. 43.7%; specificity = 61.three% vs. 42.0%, respectively).26
Management
- Abstract
- Nomenclature
- Risk Factors
- Pathogenesis
- Clinical Presentation
- Diagnosis
- Direction
- Special Considerations
- References
The direction of SSTIs is determined primarily by their severity and location, and past the patient's comorbidities (Figure 5). According to guidelines from the Infectious Diseases Society of America, initial management is determined by the presence or absence of purulence, acuity, and type of infection.v
Initial Management of a Patient with Skin and Soft Tissue Infection
Figure v.
MILD TO MODERATE INFECTIONS
Topical antibiotics (e.yard., mupirocin [Bactroban], retapamulin [Altabax]) are options in patients with impetigo and folliculitis (Table 5).v,27 Beta-lactams are constructive in children with nonpurulent SSTIs, such as uncomplicated cellulitis or impetigo.28 In adults, mild to moderate SSTIs respond well to beta-lactams in the absence of suppuration.xvi Patients who do non amend or who worsen later 48 hours of treatment should receive antibiotics to cover possible MRSA infection and imaging to detect purulence.16
Tabular array v.
Antibiotic Choices for Mild to Moderate Skin and Soft Tissue Infections in Adults and Children
Antibiotic | Dosage | Comments |
---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balmy purulent SSTIs in easily accessible areas without significant overlying cellulitis tin be treated with incision and drainage alone.29,30 In children, minimally invasive techniques (e.m., stab incision, hemostat rupture of septations, in-dwelling drain placement) are effective, reduce morbidity and hospital stay, and are more economical compared with traditional drainage and wound packing.31
Antibiotic therapy is required for abscesses that are associated with all-encompassing cellulitis, rapid progression, or poor response to initial drainage; that involve specific sites (due east.g., face, hands, genitalia); and that occur in children and older adults or in those who have significant comorbid illness or immunosuppression.32 In uncomplicated cellulitis, five days of treatment is equally effective every bit 10 days.33 In a randomized controlled trial of 200 children with uncomplicated SSTIs primarily caused by MRSA, clindamycin and cephalexin (Keflex) were equally constructive.34
Severe INFECTIONS
Inpatient treatment is necessary for patients who take uncontrolled infection despite adequate outpatient antimicrobial therapy or who cannot tolerate oral antibiotics (Figure 6). Hospitalization is also indicated for patients who initially nowadays with astringent or complicated infections, unstable comorbid illnesses, or signs of systemic sepsis, or who demand surgical intervention nether anesthesia.3,v Wide-spectrum antibiotics with proven effectiveness against gram-positive and gram-negative organisms and anaerobes should be used until pathogen-specific sensitivities are available; coverage can then be narrowed. Intravenous antibiotics should be continued until the clinical moving picture improves, the patient tin tolerate oral intake, and drainage or debridement is completed. The recommended elapsing of antibody therapy for hospitalized patients is seven to fourteen days. A Cochrane review did not establish the superiority of any i pathogen-sensitive antibody over another in the treatment of MRSA SSTI.35 Intravenous antibiotics may exist continued at dwelling house under close supervision afterward initiation in the infirmary or emergency section.36 Antibiotic choices for severe infections (including MRSA SSTI) are outlined in Table 6.5,27
Inpatient Management of a Patient with Skin and Soft Tissue Infection
Figure 6.
Table 6.
Antibody Choices for Necrotizing and Other Complicated Skin and Soft Tissue Infections in Adults and Children
Antibody | Dosage | Comments | |
---|---|---|---|
Carbapenems |
| ||
Ertapenem (Invanz) |
| ||
Imipenem/cilastatin (Primaxin) |
| ||
Meropenem (Merrem Iv) |
| ||
Cefotaxime (Claforan) |
|
| |
Ceftaroline (Teflaro) |
|
| |
Ceftriaxone (Rocephin) |
|
| |
Dalbavancin (Dalvance) |
|
| |
Dalfopristin/quinupristin (Synercid) |
|
| |
Daptomycin (Cubicin) |
|
| |
Doxycycline |
|
| |
Linezolid (Zyvox) |
|
| |
Metronidazole |
|
| |
Oritavancin (Orbactiv) |
|
| |
Oxacillin or nafcillin |
|
| |
Penicillin plus clindamycin |
|
| |
Piperacillin/tazobactam (Zosyn) |
|
| |
Telavancin (Vibativ) |
|
| |
Tigecycline (Tygacil) |
|
| |
Vancomycin |
|
|
Necrotizing Fasciitis. Treatment of necrotizing fasciitis involves early recognition and surgical consultation for debridement of necrotic tissue combined with empiric high-dose intravenous broad-spectrum antibiotics.5 The antibiotic spectrum can be narrowed one time the infecting microbes are identified and susceptibility testing results are available. Monomicrobial necrotizing fasciitis caused by streptococcal and clostridial infections is treated with penicillin G and clindamycin; S. aureus infections are treated according to susceptibilities. Antibiotic therapy should be continued until features of sepsis accept resolved and surgery is completed. Patients may require repeated surgery until debridement and drainage are complete and healing has commenced.
Special Considerations
- Abstract
- Classification
- Risk Factors
- Pathogenesis
- Clinical Presentation
- Diagnosis
- Management
- Special Considerations
- References
Immunocompromised patients are more prone to SSTIs and may non demonstrate classic clinical features and laboratory findings considering of their attenuated inflammatory response. Diagnostic testing should exist performed early to identify the causative organism and evaluate the extent of involvement, and antibiotic therapy should be commenced to cover possible pathogens, including atypical organisms that tin cause serious infections (e.thou., resistant gram-negative leaner, anaerobes, fungi).5
Specific types of SSTIs may consequence from identifiable exposures. Dog and true cat bites in an immunocompromised host and those that involve the face or hand, periosteum, or articulation capsule are typically treated with a beta-lactam antibiotic or beta-lactamase inhibitor (east.g., amoxicillin/clavulanate [Augmentin]).5 In patients allergic to penicillin, a combination of trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole or a quinolone with clindamycin or metronidazole (Flagyl) can exist used. A recent article in American Family unit Physician provides farther details about prophylaxis in patients with cat or dog bites (https://www.aafp.org/afp/2014/0815/p239.html).37
Simple SSTIs that result from exposure to fresh water are treated empirically with a quinolone, whereas doxycycline is used for those that occur after exposure to salt water. The choice is based on the presumptive infecting organisms (e.g., Aeromonas hydrophila, Vibrio vulnificus, Mycobacterium marinum).5
In patients with at to the lowest degree 1 prior episode of cellulitis, administering prophylactic oral penicillin, 250 mg twice daily for six months, reduces the adventure of recurrence for up to three years by 47%.38
Data Sources: A PubMed search was completed using the key term skin and soft tissue infections. The search included systematic reviews, meta-analyses, reviews of clinical trials and other main sources, and prove-based guidelines. As well searched were the Cochrane database, the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence guidelines, and Essential Show Plus. Search dates: May 7, 2014, through May 27, 2015.
To see the full commodity, log in or buy access.
REFERENCES
show all references
1. Hersh AL, et al. National trends in ambulatory visits and antibody prescribing for skin and soft-tissue infections. Arch Intern Med. 2008;168(fourteen):1585–1591. ...
ii. Pallin DJ, et al. Increased US emergency department visits for skin and soft tissue infections, and changes in antibody choices, during the emergence of customs-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Ann Emerg Med. 2008;51(three):291–298.
iii. Eron LJ, et al. Managing skin and soft tissue infections. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2003;52(suppl 1):i3–i17.
iv. May AK. Pare and soft tissue infections. Surg Clin North Am. 2009;89(two):403–420.
five. Stevens DL, et al. Do guidelines for the diagnosis and direction of skin and soft tissue infections. Clin Infect Dis. 2014;59(ii):e10–e52.
6. Jones ME, et al. Epidemiology and antibody susceptibility of bacteria causing skin and soft tissue infections in the The states and Europe. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2003;22(iv):406–419.
7. Stevens DL, et al. Practice guidelines for the diagnosis and management of skin and soft-tissue infections [published corrections appear in Clin Infect Dis. 2005;41(12):1830 and Clin Infect Dis. 2006;42(8):1219]. Clin Infect Dis. 2005;41(10):1373–1406.
8. U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Uncomplicated and complicated skin and skin structure infections—developing antimicrobial drugs for treatment. http://www.fda.gov/ohrms/dockets/98fr/2566dft.pdf. Accessed May 24, 2014.
9. Ki Five, et al. Bacterial skin and soft tissue infections in adults: a review of their epidemiology, pathogenesis, diagnosis, treatment and site of care. Can J Infect Dis Med Microbiol. 2008;19(ii):173–184.
x. Gabillot-CarrĂ© G, et al. Acute bacterial skin infections and cellulitis. Curr Opin Infect Dis. 2007;xx(ii):118–123.
11. Kowalski TJ, et al. Epidemiology, treatment, and prevention of community-acquired methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infections. Mayo Clin Proc. 2005;80(9):1201–1207.
12. May L, et al. Cocky-reported incidence of pare and soft tissue infections amongst deployed Us armed forces. Travel Med Infect Dis. 2011;9(4):213–220.
thirteen. Decker CF. Skin and soft tissue infections in the athlete. Dis Mon. 2010;56(7):414–421.
14. Suaya JA, et al. Skin and soft tissue infections and associated complications among commercially insured patients aged 0–64 years with and without diabetes in the U.S. PLoS 1. 2013;8(four):e60057.
15. Habif TP. Clinical Dermatology: A Color Guide to Diagnosis and Therapy. 5th ed. New York, NY: Mosby; 2010:335–381.
16. Jeng A, et al. The role of beta-hemolytic streptococci in causing diffuse, nonculturable cellulitis. Medicine (Baltimore). 2010;89(4):217–226.
17. Moet GJ, et al. Contemporary causes of skin and soft tissue infections in North America, Latin America, and Europe: report from the Scout Antimicrobial Surveillance Program (1998–2004). Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2007;57(1):7–13.
18. Wall DB, et al. Objective criteria may help in distinguishing necrotizing fasciitis from nonnecrotizing soft tissue infection. Am J Surg. 2000;179(1):17–21.
19. Wong CH, et al. The LRINEC (Laboratory Adventure Indicator for Necrotizing Fasciitis) score: a tool for distinguishing necrotizing fasciitis from other soft tissue infections. Crit Care Med. 2004;32(vii):1535–1541.
20. Mills AM, et al. Are claret cultures necessary in adults with cellulitis? Ann Emerg Med. 2005;45(five):548–549.
21. Perl B, et al. Cost-effectiveness of blood cultures for adult patients with cellulitis. Clin Infect Dis. 1999;29(six):1483–1488.
22. Businesswoman EJ, et al. A guide to utilization of the microbiology laboratory for diagnosis of infectious diseases. Clin Infect Dis. 2013;57(4):e22–e121.
23. Abrahamian FM, et al. Use of routine wound cultures to evaluate cutaneous abscesses for community-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Ann Emerg Med. 2007;l(one):66–67.
24. Schmid MR, et al. Differentiation of necrotizing fasciitis and cellulitis using MR imaging. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1998;170(3):615–620.
25. Malghem J, et al. Necrotizing fasciitis: contribution and limitations of diagnostic imaging. Articulation Bone Spine. 2013;fourscore(two):146–154.
26. Marin JR, et al. Emergency ultrasound-assisted test of skin and soft tissue infections in the pediatric emergency department. Acad Emerg Med. 2013;xx(6):545–553.
27. Micromedex ii.0. http://www.micromedexsolutions.com (subscription required). Accessed May 25, 2014.
28. Williams DJ, et al. Comparative effectiveness of antibiotic treatment strategies for pediatric pare and soft-tissue infections. Pediatrics. 2011;128(3):e479–e487.
29. Duong Thousand, et al. Randomized, controlled trial of antibiotics in the direction of customs-acquired pare abscesses in the pediatric patient. Ann Emerg Med. 2010;55(5):401–407.
30. Hankin A, et al. Are antibiotics necessary later incision and drainage of a cutaneous abscess? Ann Emerg Med. 2007;50(1):49–51.
31. Wright TN, et al. Minimally invasive drainage of subcutaneous abscesses reduces hospital cost and length of stay. South Med J. 2013;106(12):689–692.
32. Liu C, et al. Clinical exercise guidelines past the Infectious Diseases Club of America for the handling of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infections in adults and children [published correction appears in Clin Infect Dis. 2011;53(three):319]. Clin Infect Dis. 2011;52(three):e18–e55.
33. Hepburn MJ, et al. Comparison of short-course (five days) and standard (10 days) treatment for uncomplicated cellulitis. Arch Intern Med. 2004;164(15):1669–1674.
34. Chen AE, et al. Randomized controlled trial of cephalexin versus clindamycin for uncomplicated pediatric peel infections. Pediatrics. 2011;127(3):e573–e580.
35. Gurusamy KS, et al. Antibiotic therapy for the handling of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infections in surgical wounds. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013;(8):CD009726.
36. Corwin P, et al. Randomised controlled trial of intravenous antibiotic treatment for cellulitis at habitation compared with hospital. BMJ. 2005;330(7483):129–135.
37. Ellis R, et al. Canis familiaris and cat bites [published correction appears in Am Fam Physician. 2015;91(ten):676]. Am Fam Medico. 2014;90(iv):239–243.
38. Thomas M, et al. Safety antibiotics for the prevention of cellulitis (erysipelas) of the leg: results of the United kingdom of great britain and northern ireland Dermatology Clinical Trials Network'south PATCH II trial. Br J Dermatol. 2012;166(1):169–178.
Copyright © 2015 by the American Academy of Family Physicians.
This content is endemic by the AAFP. A person viewing information technology online may make i printout of the material and may employ that printout only for his or her personal, not-commercial reference. This fabric may not otherwise be downloaded, copied, printed, stored, transmitted or reproduced in any medium, whether now known or afterwards invented, except as authorized in writing by the AAFP. Contact afpserv@aafp.org for copyright questions and/or permission requests.
MOST Contempo Outcome
Mar 2022
Access the latest issue of American Family Medico
Read the Issue
Email Alerts
Don't miss a single issue. Sign up for the complimentary AFP email table of contents.
Sign Upwards Now
Source: https://www.aafp.org/afp/2015/0915/p474.html
0 Response to "Soft Tissue Infection Cant Be Biopsied Again"
Post a Comment